1. TMN states that, on page 10 of the Draft Report, the quantification of envelopes addressed to representatives of the bidders is incorrect.
Position of ICP-ANACOM
Of the sixteen sealed envelopes delivered to ICP-ANACOM by the platform operator, eleven were collected during the training sessions, four were collected from the Public Attendance Service, located at the headquarters of ICP-ANACOM, between 23 and 25 November 2011 and one remained uncollected, whereas ICP-ANACOM was informed that the respective recipient would not collect it. In this context and in respect of commentary presented by TMN, ICP-ANACOM will correct this information in the final report of the auction.
2. TMN alerted to the fact that Annex 53 was left blank, assuming that the corresponding page is the one presented in error at the end of Annex 52.
Position of ICP-ANACOM
In the organization of the annexes of the Draft Report, the body of Annex 53 was replaced with the respective cover, which error will be corrected in the final auction report.
3. TMN states that, in chapter 2. Test sessions, part D. Training and test sessions , there is no reference to the fact that in the test sessions, use would be made of definitive templates (in place of those initially conveyed to the applicants), despite this being referred to in the electronic message addressed to the company on the evening of 25 November 2011.
Position of ICP-ANACOM
This issue is referenced in point g) of part F. General clarifications and other requests, whereas the answer given to this company about this issue (Annex 40) and the content of the general clarification issued by ICP-ANACOM on this question (Annex 37) is duly attached to the Draft Report.
4. VODAFONE alerts to the omission of documents within the documentation provided for the purpose of the prior hearing of interested parties, in respect of part of the clarifications which OPTIMUS sought from ICP-ANACOM, in particular in terms of Annexes 2 and 8. VODAFONE asks that it be given full knowledge of the entirety of the requests for clarification of the various interested parties in this procedure as well as the entirety of ICP-ANACOM's responses. Likewise, TMN draws the attention of ICP-ANACOM to the fact that, in the printed version of Annex 2, the last questions put by OPTIMUS are omitted, specifically question 10.17 thru question 26.
Position of ICP-ANACOM
As evidenced by Annexes 1 to 14, it was the intention of ICP-ANACOM to make available not only the clarifications provided to the interested parties, but also the full texts of the requests made by said parties. However, due to a printing error, and as regards, in particular, the request for clarification put by OPTIMUS on 25 October 2011, the last pages of the request were omitted from Annex 2. While, given the content affected, this omission did not impair the commentary received, ICP-ANACOM will include the omitted pages in the final report of the auction, thereby considering the error as rectified.
Annex 8 already contains the full content of both the request of OPTIMUS and of the clarifications provided by ICP-ANACOM.
5. TMN states that the Annexes to the Draft Report omit certain documents that were delivered to the admitted applicants, such as the "Condições de utilização dos meios alternativos à Plataforma Eletrónica" (Conditions of use of alternative electronic platform) and the "Manual de Utilização da Plataforma Eletrónica" (Electronics Platform User's Manual), whereas the company takes the view that all auction documents should be included in the annexes to the final report to ensure completeness of the process.
Position of ICP-ANACOM
ICP-ANACOM will attach the Condições de utilização dos meios alternativos à Plataforma Eletrónica" (Conditions of use of alternative electronic platform) and the Manual de Utilização da Plataforma Eletrónica (Electronics Platform User's Manual) to the final version of the auction report, notwithstanding that all items related to the auction comprise administrative processes existing at ICP-ANACOM.
